When States Rights Were Emancipatory and Federalism was Restrictive: The Interbellum Constitution of 1812-1865
Iscriviti gratuitamente
Ascolta questo episodio e molti altri. Goditi i migliori podcast su Spreaker!
Scarica e ascolta ovunque
Scarica i tuoi episodi preferiti e goditi l'ascolto, ovunque tu sia! Iscriviti o accedi ora per ascoltare offline.
When States Rights Were Emancipatory and Federalism was Restrictive: The Interbellum Constitution of 1812-1865
Questa è una trascrizione generata automaticamente. Si prega di notare che non è garantita la completa accuratezza.
Descrizione
Today, the words “federalism” and “originalism” are bandied about in the news almost daily, but to get at the underpinnings of these modern interpretations of constitutional law, it is essential...
mostra di piùEarly nineteenth-century Americans found themselves consumed by arguments about concurrent power—the areas in which the Constitution had left the line between federal and state authority unclear. The scope of specific concurrent powers became increasingly important, and controversial, in the early nineteenth century. In 1815, the most pressing political and legal issues increasingly concerned situations in which multiple layers of governmental power overlapped—and the Constitution provided no clear delineation. Moreover, the choice of which level of government regulated each subject had dramatic consequences for the policy that resulted.
To explore this topic is today’s guest, Alison LaCroix, author of “The Interbellum Constitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms.” We see just how deeply these constitutional questions dominated the discourse of the time.
Informazioni
Autore | Parthenon Podcast Network |
Organizzazione | Salem Media (USA) |
Sito | - |
Tag |
-
|
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company