Esplicito
Trascritto
The USVI And Their Motion To Strike JP Morgan Affirmative Defenses (Part 1) (7/26/24)
26 lug 2024 ·
10 min. 13 sec.
Scarica e ascolta ovunque
Scarica i tuoi episodi preferiti e goditi l'ascolto, ovunque tu sia! Iscriviti o accedi ora per ascoltare offline.
The USVI And Their Motion To Strike JP Morgan Affirmative Defenses (Part 1) (7/26/24)
Questa è una trascrizione generata automaticamente. Si prega di notare che non è garantita la completa accuratezza.
Descrizione
In the ongoing lawsuit filed by the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) against JPMorgan Chase regarding the bank's alleged facilitation of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations, the USVI has filed a...
mostra di più
In the ongoing lawsuit filed by the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) against JPMorgan Chase regarding the bank's alleged facilitation of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations, the USVI has filed a motion to strike several of JPMorgan's affirmative defenses. These defenses suggest that the USVI government itself was complicit in enabling Epstein's activities.
JPMorgan argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the extent of the USVI's involvement and alleged complicity in Epstein's crimes. The bank claims that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, facilitated Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and spreading his influence throughout the government. The bank also alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background.
The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is seen by JPMorgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. The USVI, on the other hand, maintains that JPMorgan's defenses are baseless and intended to deflect from the bank's failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior.
(commercial at 7:44)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.4.pdf (courtlistener.com)
mostra meno
JPMorgan argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the extent of the USVI's involvement and alleged complicity in Epstein's crimes. The bank claims that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, facilitated Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and spreading his influence throughout the government. The bank also alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background.
The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is seen by JPMorgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. The USVI, on the other hand, maintains that JPMorgan's defenses are baseless and intended to deflect from the bank's failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior.
(commercial at 7:44)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.4.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Informazioni
| Autore | Bobby Capucci |
| Organizzazione | Bobby Capucci |
| Sito | - |
| Tag |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
