Esplicito
Trascritto
Stacey Plaskett And Her Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivor Lawsuit (Part 2) (7/11/24)
11 lug 2024 ·
12 min. 24 sec.
Scarica e ascolta ovunque
Scarica i tuoi episodi preferiti e goditi l'ascolto, ovunque tu sia! Iscriviti o accedi ora per ascoltare offline.
Stacey Plaskett And Her Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivor Lawsuit (Part 2) (7/11/24)
Questa è una trascrizione generata automaticamente. Si prega di notare che non è garantita la completa accuratezza.
Descrizione
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit,...
mostra di più
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.
Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.
What do the facts tell us?
Let's dive in and find out.
(commercial at 8:27)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
mostra meno
Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.
What do the facts tell us?
Let's dive in and find out.
(commercial at 8:27)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Informazioni
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
Commenti