Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance 542 U.S. 55 (2004)
18 ott 2023 ·
39 min. 39 sec.
Iscriviti gratuitamente
Ascolta questo episodio e molti altri. Goditi i migliori podcast su Spreaker!
Scarica e ascolta ovunque
Scarica i tuoi episodi preferiti e goditi l'ascolto, ovunque tu sia! Iscriviti o accedi ora per ascoltare offline.
Descrizione
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance Holding that agency can be compelled to act if time period is specified by law.Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004),...
mostra di più
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Holding that agency can be compelled to act if time period is specified by law.Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004), was a Supreme Court case that held that although the Administrative Procedure Actsays that a person may challenge an agency's failure to act, this provision essentially just carries forward the writ of mandamus. Thus an agency cannot be compelled to act unless there is some non-discretionary, discrete act.
(from Wikipedia)
mostra meno
Holding that agency can be compelled to act if time period is specified by law.Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004), was a Supreme Court case that held that although the Administrative Procedure Actsays that a person may challenge an agency's failure to act, this provision essentially just carries forward the writ of mandamus. Thus an agency cannot be compelled to act unless there is some non-discretionary, discrete act.
(from Wikipedia)
Informazioni
| Autore | Danilo Feliciano |
| Sito | - |
| Tag |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
