"Is the grace of God present in the Soviet Church?" The question is wrongly asked because it can only be answered by a saint. That is, a saved and deified man. Only he can say with certainty whether the Holy Spirit is pouring into the mysteries of the Church which claims to be the successor of the Orthodox Church of all times. Only a saint truly "SEES", others who are still on the path of holiness "DO NOT SEE" and can only say whether it is „POSSIBLE” for that church to be true or whether that church is ”IMPOSSIBLE” to be true. „R. 1st Argument for validity of the MP - Recognition by the Patriarchates - pp. 49 - 50” Recognition of a local church can only be done by another church that is possibly Orthodox. In the true church the church hierarchy is guided by the Holy Spirit to all truth (John, chapter XVI, verse 13). So the question shifts the dispute to another issue: were the other patriarchates still Orthodox at the time of the recognition of the MP? So refuting the argument is wrong. A church that does not "KNOW" is a church that is not guided by the Holy Spirit and has a hierarchy composed only of "BLIND" people who err unintentionally or willfully. „S. 2nd Argument for validity of the MP - The faith of the believing people can validate the sacraments of false hierarchs - pp. 50 - 53” The only somewhat correct answer is: „a. The "worthiness" of the laity is not the objective condition for the presence of sacramental grace.” I say "sort of" because it doesn't make any argument but is just a conclusion that leaves the reader as ignorant as before. The correct answer is: in the true church it is the hierarchy which is holy and perfect and which guides the laity and monks to sanctification and salvation because they are the only mystically initiated into the steps of the priesthood and have already attained what they wish to give to others who are subject to them. The others, laity and monastics, can only be guided and perfected by the hierarchy and have no sacramental relevance. But when both are unperfected and unsanctified "the blind lead the blind" (Matthew, chapter XV, verse 14 and Luke, chapter VI, verse 39). „T. 3rd Argument for the validity of the MP - The "simple" believers do not care about "abstract truths" and "politics," but only the good deeds demanded by the moral code of the Gospel - pp. 54 - 55” I cannot answer here because there is not enough room for such a broad debate. „U. The loss of grace as a process over time, Conclusion - pp. 55 - 57” Whoever accepts this will have to prove it. If he wants to prove this he must say when and how much God regulated the length of time and conditions of gradual degradation. That is to say, what is the system by which it is ascertained what percentage of "grace" those who deviate still have. And how will that be? Will there be in the holy chalice, for example, only 63% of the body and blood of our Lord and God Jesus Christ? But what if God has standardized the period of time to be very long, and now the papists also have about 12.5% of grace left? This is where these intellectualist moderations and balanced methods lead. To blasphemy! In the Holy Gospels it is clearly stated that "the time of salvation is today" because no one knows if he will live tomorrow. And then: Jesus Christ, yesterday and today and forever, is the same. And if one wants to bring in favor of this hypothesis as an argument the past when even great saints of the Church delayed for a period of time before declaring the deviationist faction devoid of the grace of the holy mysteries, then one must also prove these things: that even then and now information and people circulated with the same speed.