In a recent legal development, the multinational technology company, Apple, finds itself at the center of an intriguing case with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ). After an exhaustive investigation into the alleged monopolistic techniques of Google's advertising system, the DOJ has indirectly drawn in Apple, forcing a shift in its otherwise routine affairs. While the primary subject of the antitrust lawsuit is Google, Apple's involvement in certain parallel aspects of the case has sparked fresh narratives in the evolving discourse about monopoly and competition reliability in the tech industry.

To uncover the facts, the Department of Justice's new antitrust lawsuit over Google's alleged advertising technology monopoly requires meticulous navigation between the lines. Google's purported monopoly has evoked stern backlash from both the public and the legal fraternities, echoing sentiments about monopoly abuse in the tech industry.

This intricate recital plays an unfamiliar tune for technology giant Apple, who unwittingly finds itself swept into these proceedings due to partnership pressures. While the company is not directly implicated in the allegations against Google, as this case unravels Apple's connections with Google will undoubtedly be illuminated, potentially cast the company in an uneasy limelight.

Simultaneously, in another separate but related issue, Apple recently found itself being ordered to pay a hefty fine of $89 million along with Goldman Sachs. This further represents a growing concern about Apple's approach to handling industry competition and customer services. The order was precipitated from a failure related to the Apple Card, which caused significant user dissatisfaction.

These tales of Apple's legal tangles illustrate the coming challenges for many in the modern tech industry, as governments and advocates increasingly challenge the operational methods of these massive corporations. As we continue tracking this unfolding scenario with Apple, Google, and the Department of Justice, it is vital to remain informed and dispassionate, separating the facts from speculation.