Sorry, my comment was poorly written. I meant to say that A: People saw the rules of conduct at the RR as censorship for some reason. At least that's what I gathered from youtube comments on Seth Andrew's videos about RR etc. B: All it said was that ideas will be challanged, just don't harass people over gender, race, relgion, etc. C: When I said "I saw nothing that isn't already said" I meant most policies more or less say to not harass or bully people. It is the standard "don't be a dick" cause more or less. But I guess the "oppressed" white male atheist can't insult feminist and feminism which is the main target of attacker here, sadly. And LGBT.

Godless Nerds. I'm sorry I don't understand your comment. "People were overreacting to the rules" What people, which rules? " I saw nothing that isn't already said." You saw nothing but, it was already said? "People are far too reactionary." I think I agree!

People were overreacting to the rules. I saw nothing that isn't already said. That though ideas will be attacked, you don't attack people. People are far too reactionary.